Antiquatis

It is We who Seek the Truth of the Universe In Order to Achieve Enlightenment

* FAQ * Search View unanswered posts
* Register * Login View active topics
It is currently Fri Sep 10, 2010 4:09 pm




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Antigravity, Invisibility, and Teleportation--theory
PostPosted: Sat Sep 26, 2009 10:09 pm 
Offline
Legatus Legionis
Legatus Legionis
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2004 10:38 pm
Posts: 1795
Location: Northern Rockies
It seems a number of members of these fora have memories, dreams or subconscious recall of some fairly advanced technology. Perhaps if we share what we know, we may find a pattern--or better yet--rediscover the technology for ourselves.

As most of you already know, I became interested in Dewey B. Larson's Reciprocal System of physical theory back around 1991, and it's been something of an obsession with me since then. I suspect that there was something about Larson's unique ideas that kicked something deep in the back of my mind... something that resonated, but not as an "I knew this before,' but an "Aha! Now I understand how it works." But... I also held the contention that Larson's Reciprocal System was just a "really good first draft," and he did not get it quite right. So, I started doing some in-depth research with my friend Prof. KVK Nehru of Hyderabad, India, which eventually led to the development of "RS2: The Reevaluation of the Reciprocal System of theory" and a new way to comprehend the relationships between space, time and consciousness.

Combining what I've learned with what I know (or knew!), I've been able to get some thoughts on just how some of this advanced technology must operation. So, here are my premises and thoughts on the subject:

Larson's basics are right on: the Universe is composed of "motion", not "things." Understanding what that means is important... it is not "motion" as conventionally understood, but as Larson eventually stated, "[Motion] is nothing more than abstract CHANGE in three dimensions." So, the Universe is composed of "change"... but change of what? Larson also includes a reference system of "absolute locations", that move apart from each other, at the speed of light. He calls this the "Natural Reference System." When a "motion", such as an atom, gets involved, what it does is CHANGE THE RATE at which these "absolute locations" move apart from each other... sometimes, to the extent that they start moving TOWARDS each other, rather than apart, and we call that "gravity."

So, all the photons, particles and atoms are nothing but systems of "change", changing the locations of the Universe. In computer terms, it's called a "transformation matrix", that is fed points and "transforms" them into new locations--just as Larson describes.

What Larson failed to include was the concept of reciprocal GEOMETRY... in other words, "points" also have a reciprocal--PLANES. The reciprocal of space is time, so the vacuum of points in space is viewed as a SOLID OF PLANES in time. The effect of these temporal planes is what we call "force fields"--magnetism, electricity, etc. Most of the advanced tech operates using these fields, rotating and bucking magnetic and electric fields and hence--are manipulating TIME to change SPACE. This is a new concept, not recognized by conventional science--and probably limiting them!

The second problem area with Larson's reasoning is that he considered the geometry of both time and space to be LINEAR--proceeding in a line. Yet, when you get into the field of electronics, capacitance and inductance must be represented by rotational quantities--imaginary numbers. We know these fields are an effect of TIME, so therefore, at least from the illusion of our conscious perspective, TIME must be ROTATIONAL in nature--not linear.

Linear space and rotational time can be represented mathematically by complex numbers. So the Universe is "complex," in a way! What is important about this, is that the "complex plane" (or Argand diagram) has both positive and NEGATIVE axes... in other words, there exists something called "negative space".

The annotations in the Varo edition of the Case for the UFO made several interesting claims that led me to believe that the UFOs operate in negative space, outside the field of our perception (we can only perceive positive space--and time only indirectly through the effect fields have upon space.)

Several years ago, I had an interesting experience out on the plains of Wyoming, in the Shirley Basin area... I encountered what I called an "invisible whirly thing". Curiously, it coincided at a point where I thought I finally figured out the Reciprocal System, and understood the Universe. So the dang Universe threw something at me that I could not explain, or even comprehend--the invisible, whirly thing.

It was evening, during a full moon in May. I was walking back to my house, and paused to notice how bright the moon was--so bright, it was like daylight. In the middle of nowhere, it is REALLY quiet, like you can hear a pin drop--5 miles away. And I heard a whooshing sound, coming at me from the south. It reminded me of the sound of a boomerang. I was looking right at the source of the sound... and it came right at me, and flew about 3 feet (1 meter) over my head, and continued on. Yet, I SAW NOTHING! Just heard it. But I was looking right at it, and it wasn't there. Only the sound, with nothing I could perceive to make that sound.

When I encountered the idea of "negative space" through the use of complex numbers to represent motion in the Reciprocal System, it hit me... that "thing" had its dimensions in negative space--it could still AFFECT space, and hence make noise, but was INVISIBLE to human perception, as we cannot perceive (nor conceive) negative lengths.

The descriptions of invisibility in the Varo annotations cinched it for me... they were describing a technique to move into negative space, to become invisible--yet retain the ability to affect physical objects, like ghosts.

Which brings up the second concept, which must exist if negative space does... negative time. Atomic structures are positive time displacements, and produce "gravity". A negative time displacement would have the opposite effect--ANTIGRAVITY, but retaining atomic structure. (One of the problems is, if atoms are gravitating, and you expose them to an anti-gravity field, the atoms will come apart and disintegrate. The idea of negative time overcomes this problem.)

Another method of antigravity comes from the post on Mount Lassen... the levitating sleds in the tunnel systems. It was noted that it had a copper base. Copper is diamagnetic--in other words, when exposed to a magnetic field, copper tends to produce its own magnetic field with North and South poles matching up, and hence opposing the magnetic field it is exposed to. If an adequate diamagnetic material could be found that could oppose the Earth's magnetic field, then the material would just "float" on the magnetic lines of force, requiring NO ENERGY to maintain its levitation.

So, those are some of my thoughts. I know I'm a bit "technical", but I'd love to hear your thoughts, even if symbolic. Ever little piece of the puzzle helps to see what the big picture is.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Antigravity, Invisibility, and Teleportation--theory
PostPosted: Sun Sep 27, 2009 10:37 am 
Offline
Cellarius
Cellarius
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 6:04 pm
Posts: 402
Location: San Diego, CA
LoneBear wrote:
Copper is diamagnetic

That is an interesting point. Ever since I was a little kid I've been obsessed with Bismuth; I always wanted new samples of it for my mineral collection (which is extensive, in part owing to my great grand father).

Here are some of the characteristics of Bismuth:

Although ununpentium is theoretically more diamagnetic, no other metal is verified to be more naturally diamagnetic than bismuth. (Superdiamagnetism is a different physical phenomenon.) Of any metal, it has the second lowest thermal conductivity (after mercury) and the highest Hall coefficient. It has a high electrical resistance. When deposited in sufficiently thin layers on a substrate, bismuth is a semiconductor, rather than a poor metal.

I also recall reading a few (but not many) accounts of crashed UFO's being dissected that had a Bismuth 'skin'...

_________________
How much net work could a network work, if a network could net work?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Antigravity, Invisibility, and Teleportation--theory
PostPosted: Sun Sep 27, 2009 12:34 pm 
Offline
Legatus Legionis
Legatus Legionis
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2004 10:38 pm
Posts: 1795
Location: Northern Rockies
Tulan wrote:
I also recall reading a few (but not many) accounts of crashed UFO's being dissected that had a Bismuth 'skin'..

"Skins" are usually interfaces for surface effects. For example, charged electrons move to the surface of a conductor, as in radio emission from an antenna. In their uncharged state, they are distributed evenly through a conductor, as "current." Cold electricity is the inverse of the charged electron, moving to the center of a conductor.

Lightning is probably the biggest "charge" on the planet, and the impact of lightning upon metal (impulse) will cause electrons to combine, producing birotating (superconducting) electron pairs and cold electricity... you get the works. Consider:

The Case for the UFO, Varo annotations wrote:
p 37: "Nodes," are the old Traps & burial "Grounds" Here Lay quite a few Dead-Ships they cannot get away. The old types couldn't but these new types can. It was nodes in great number on Surface of this Earth that gave the clue to L-M's of How to Neatralize forces but a floor pattern in METAL ACTUALLY SHOWED THE MEANS.

p .163: WHAT HAPPENS WHEN A BOLT OF LIGHTING HITS AT A POINT WHERE THERE IS A "NODE" SUCH AS A ''SWIRL" IN THE MAGNETIC SEA OR WHERE A MAG. "DEAD' SPOT" caused by the NEUTRALIZATION OF MAG. SEA contra GRAVITY ESPECIALLY, WHAT, WHEN THE NODE & BOLT BOTH ACT OVER BRONZE INLAY

Bronze is a mix of copper and tin... copper is diamagnetic, tin can go either way (gray is diamagnetic, white is paramagnetic--kind of like a "switch"). Now if the rock that the bronze was inlaid upon contained a quantity of bismuth (which would be a good flooring material, because of its low thermal expansion coefficient), and struck by lightning in a "magnetic free" zone, it may just produce sufficient diamagnetism to float on the Earth's magnetic field. Take a chunk of floor, throw a piece of carpet on it for comfort, and you're zooming around Arabia in no time. :D

Nodes/vortices on the Earth's surface would produce some rather strange effects, so it is likely that they were considered sacred spots--and people like to build fancy temples at sacred spots, so fancy, bronze-inlaid flooring would be a likely possibility.

"Nodes" seem to be an important part of the equation. What the annotations describe in the book are basically LaGrangian points, but on the surface of the Earth where gravitational "forces" are null, and under those conditions, the impulse of lightning would cause a totally different reordering of the magnetic domains in an atom. I'll do some investigating into how diamagnetism works at an atomic level, to see what it turns up.

But it does seem that antigravity systems aren't really anti-gravity, as much as they are diamagnetic. I would think that by including tin and bismuth in the mix, the bismuth could act as a semiconductor path to change the magnetic response of the tin between para and diamagnetism, thus controlling the amount of "lift."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Antigravity, Invisibility, and Teleportation--theory
PostPosted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:42 pm 
Offline
Cellarius
Cellarius
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 12:58 am
Posts: 425
Location: University of Houston, Houston, Texas
LoneBear wrote:
If an adequate diamagnetic material could be found that could oppose the Earth's magnetic field, then the material would just "float" on the magnetic lines of force, requiring NO ENERGY to maintain its levitation.

A couple of things, Earth has both a magnetic and a gravitational field, but the magnetic field is not responsible for the objects gravitating. The idea of levitating objects using magnetism has generally been the same thing, except that getting strong enough magnets to offset the weight of the object is where the trouble lies. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Meiss ... 390048.jpg) So essentially, we need to find gravitational nodes by identifying points on the earth where magnetic field is exceptionally strong OR where gravitational field is exceptionally weak, or both.

I suspect that the nodes are places where this happens, so that would make it possible for UFO's to land and take off from there, and so on. Yet, to really use antigravity, it must be made independent of position.

I just want to throw an idea out there, it has been observed that at very high alternating current frequencies, and I was wondering about that. Now, if we can create a resonance of a magnetic field, where an oscillating magnetic field would perhaps tap into the fundamental frequency of diamagnetism of the substance, that could create a substantial field without the use of a large magnet. Generally the diamagnetism is lost after a certain time, but if there is a frequency tied to the magnetizing and diamagnetizing cycle, one might be able to make it float.

_________________
It is time.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Antigravity, Invisibility, and Teleportation--theory
PostPosted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 9:08 pm 
Offline
Legatus Legionis
Legatus Legionis
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2004 10:38 pm
Posts: 1795
Location: Northern Rockies
Gopi wrote:
A couple of things, Earth has both a magnetic and a gravitational field, but the magnetic field is not responsible for the objects gravitating.

Think about that... according to the RS, the atom is a MAGNETIC rotating system--there is NO 3-dimensional rotating system in the RS, only 1D (electric) and 2d (magnetic). Yet, the atom gravitates because the magnetic rotation is outward in time, and therefore inward in space. It is the magnetic rotation that is producing the gravitational motion.

So the Earth doesn't really have a "gravitational" field... what it has, is a net, inward motion in 3 dimensions that is the result of magnetic rotations of the constituent atoms moving outward in time.

Gopi wrote:
The idea of levitating objects using magnetism has generally been the same thing, except that getting strong enough magnets to offset the weight of the object is where the trouble lies. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Meiss ... 390048.jpg) So essentially, we need to find gravitational nodes by identifying points on the earth where magnetic field is exceptionally strong OR where gravitational field is exceptionally weak, or both.

Or, change our thinking a bit... I was studying diamagnetism, and when I finally got it down to an atomic model, I found that the only way I could find that would produce a diamagnetic vector would be if there was an electric current flowing in the atom, oriented in such a way that its EM field would oppose the magnetic field it was exposed to. And that "current" would only be present if the magnetic field was there.

Initial problem was that to generate a current with a magnetic field, you need to have the electric field changing in time (lines of force must move). Then I remembered something that Nehru wrote a while back, about a particular condition where an electric current would flow, without any "help"--the birotating electron, or Cooper pair. The uncharged electron is a constant rotation; it does not vary--until it is paired up and dimensional reduction changes it into a 1D wave--varying in both time and space, and hence producing an electric field, current, and associated magnetic field. The article was about the superconductor.

Nehru's article: Superconductivity: A Time Region Phenomenon?

It appears that a diamagnetic material may just be a very poor superconductor--rather than having regular electrons just floating around like most atoms do, there are conditions that create and maintain a quantity of birotating electron pairs. When exposed to an external magnetic field, the superconducting electrons kick in and try to expel the magnetic lines of force, causing the permeability to drop below 1.

If this is the case, and we can figure out the circumstances in which pair production is promoted, we may be able to make a room-temperature diamagnetic superconductor, which would just float in the air by itself, on the Earth's magnetic field. (The Varo notes mentioned that it was lightning hitting bronze-inlaid flooring that first triggered it... lightning is known to produce large quantities of birotating electrons--a phenomenon we call ball lightning.)

Gopi wrote:
I suspect that the nodes are places where this happens, so that would make it possible for UFO's to land and take off from there, and so on. Yet, to really use antigravity, it must be made independent of position.

I suspect that those nodes are just part of a catalyst for setting up the material to a superconductive, diamagnetic state.

Gopi wrote:
Generally the diamagnetism is lost after a certain time, but if there is a frequency tied to the magnetizing and diamagnetizing cycle, one might be able to make it float.

I suspect that might be true... magnetism is a rotational vibration, so it should respond to an external field, particularly if it was at the resonant frequency. Thermal motion and isotopic mass would be the immediate problems, as they would alter that frequency substantially.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Antigravity, Invisibility, and Teleportation--theory
PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 1:03 pm 
Offline
Legatus Legionis
Legatus Legionis
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2004 10:38 pm
Posts: 1795
Location: Northern Rockies
Had an odd dream last night, concerning antigravity. I was out in a jungle (don't know where) and had uncovered a DHD (Stargate SG1 "Dial Home Device"). I had an old notebook with me, and was looking at one of the pages that had some sketches of Runes on them:
Attachment:
File comment: Runes in Notebook
Runes.jpg
Runes.jpg [ 4.26 KiB | Viewed 311 times ]

It seems that the DHD had a set of Runes on the inner ring, and other symbols on the outer ring. I was "punching in" the runes into the DHD (there were only 4 sketched on the page, though there may have been a 2nd page), when another rune on the outer ring just lit up by itself. Strange looking thing, like a backward musical note. It was on the lower left side of the DHD, about the "7 o'clock" position:
Attachment:
File comment: Backward, double note
doublenote.gif
doublenote.gif [ 105 Bytes | Viewed 311 times ]

Not the first time that weird musical stuff has shown up in my dreams. I touched it and it made that unique "chunk" sound of the DHD, then I was standing in what seemed to be the engine room of a power boat (larger than a pleasure craft, but smaller than the commercial boats). They were having problems with the engine, as something was either broken or out of phase, because the whole place was vibrating like a washing machine out-of-balance. I asked was the screw speed was ("screw" is a Navy term for propeller), and somebody told me 70,000 rpm--bit high for a boat! I figured the prop was damaged, and asked them to stop the engine, so I could look at it. There was a hatch that opened so you could see the impeller; someone yanked the cover off for me and I looked in, and saw that same, strange "note" -- the prop had to impellers, but they were one on top of the other and only half a blade, just like that note spinning on its axis. But it didn't look broken--it looked like it was supposed to be. I yelled back that the screw was OK, and it must be the wrong speed--it had to be an multiple of the Schumann resonance and the control mechanism must have gone out of phase.

Then I realized that when I was looking out of the hatch into the water... well, it wasn't water, it was air, and the ground was several miles below me. That's when I woke up.

I distinctly remembered 70,000 rpm when I woke, and that conventional mechanisms couldn't do that, BUT a Tesla turbine COULD (experimenters have had Tesla's bladeless, boundary-layer turbines up to 100,000 rpm). Something else in the back of my mind about the offset impellers creating a "chord" frequency that vibrated something through precession, that appears to have created a rotational vibration on the atomic structure that would neutralize its mass.

Gopi and I were having a discussion about something similar a few nights back (about how the Reciprocal System rotational vibration could be used to generate antigravity effects, without damaging atomic cohesion), and that appears to have triggered some kind of memory.

Not sure what the Stargate DHD reference was about, but since the runes were in my "notebook" (long-term memory), it must have been someplace I've been in the past, perhaps a past life, which was triggered off by that conversation Gopi and I had.

Anyway, interesting dream--and quite vivid, too.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Antigravity, Invisibility, and Teleportation--theory
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 10:53 pm 
Offline
Cellarius
Cellarius
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 12:58 am
Posts: 425
Location: University of Houston, Houston, Texas
LoneBear wrote:
I was "punching in" the runes into the DHD (there were only 4 sketched on the page, though there may have been a 2nd page), when another rune on the outer ring just lit up by itself. Strange looking thing, like a backward musical note. It was on the lower left side of the DHD, about the "7 o'clock" position

Probably pulled again from Merlin's domain, with Countertime causing the frequency to be negative, hence "backward".
LoneBear wrote:
I asked was the screw speed was ("screw" is a Navy term for propeller), and somebody told me 70,000 rpm--bit high for a boat! I figured the prop was damaged, and asked them to stop the engine, so I could look at it.

I had a dream recently in which it was given that "three screws, one along each axis, is all that it takes to derive the Maxwell equations". This screw speed seems to link to that... probably obtaining electromagnetic effects by propellers.

And did those Runes symbolize anything? A Phase relationship or something?

_________________
It is time.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Antigravity, Invisibility, and Teleportation--theory
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 11:03 pm 
Offline
Legatus Legionis
Legatus Legionis
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2004 10:38 pm
Posts: 1795
Location: Northern Rockies
Gopi wrote:
Probably pulled again from Merlin's domain, with Countertime causing the frequency to be negative, hence "backward".

So I was standing "behind the sheet music" at that time, and the overlap of notes form a chord.

Gopi wrote:
And did those Runes symbolize anything? A Phase relationship or something?

The runes are ideographic and would translate as:

  • Thurisaz, Thor's rune, a gateway, the constellation Cepheus, or the number 3. (Thor has been coming up a lot lately.)
  • Perth, open doors to a temple symbolizing initiation, Perseus, or the number 14.
  • Ehwaz, a horse, meaning movement or progress, Orion, or the number 15.
  • Raido, from which we get "radio", the rune of communication and journeys, Draco, or the number 9.

Thor was the defender of man, wanting mankind to advance against the will of the gods whom preferred them as slaves. (Stargate followed this bit of mythos with the season 1 episodes concerning the Asgard.) I do notice that Orion and Draco are the common homes to the "serpent men."

Hummmm, I wonder if this is related to the Sanctuary project, and the opportunity that has been presented to get it going? A gateway (business) to open doors to a temple (monastery), movement to a different location (where there happens to be a lot of horses) developing communication (central information), all part of the grand journey.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Antigravity, Invisibility, and Teleportation--theory
PostPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 12:20 pm 
Offline
Cellarius
Cellarius
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 12:58 am
Posts: 425
Location: University of Houston, Houston, Texas
Bruce wrote:
* Thurisaz, Thor's rune, a gateway, the constellation Cepheus, or the number 3. (Thor has been coming up a lot lately.)
* Perth, open doors to a temple symbolizing initiation, Perseus, or the number 14.
* Ehwaz, a horse, meaning movement or progress, Orion, or the number 15.
* Raido, from which we get "radio", the rune of communication and journeys, Draco, or the number 9.


HA!!! 3 14 15 9... you have PI!! 3.14159...

Full circle!

_________________
It is time.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Antigravity, Invisibility, and Teleportation--theory
PostPosted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 12:54 pm 
Offline
Centurio
Centurio

Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 10:53 am
Posts: 125
Location: New Zealand
I had a visit from my friend who lives a fair distance away whom I see once a year lastnight and he informed me he had done some progress with the pyramid invention that I told him of on his last visit. The one I dreamed of.
He was in a discussion with someone whom he didnt know well and somehow he came to tell this guy of it, it turns out this guy is a physicist who is really interested in it as it works in theory and reckons it would be a massive breakthrough in science as for it to work it would have to break one of the laws of thermo dynamics as it creates perpertual motion.
They crunched numbers and found with the design using 32 magnets that it will need to be cranked up to 2,500 rpm before it will become self sustaining and at that speed there is 156,000 magnet pole collisions per minute, then it will go much faster once running.
The clear box I had around the machine, the guy reckons the pyramid had to be in a vaccuum in the box for it to work. There something about perpertual motion not being able to sustain itself with molecules around it slowing it down, hence the vaccuum.
In my dream there was a something that was connected to the box, perhaps it was a vaccuum but all along Ive thought it was an orgone genorator or something using argon but I may be confusing myself as the names are similar.
I dont think argon has much affect on its surroundings?
What Id like to learn and pass on is effects of orgone vs magnetism?
Also lets say it is an orgone generator running into the enclosed pyramid machine, is there any chance orgone has such an effect on the molecules on the immediate enviroment around the machine that it would have the same effect as the machine running in vaccuum?


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Antigravity, Invisibility, and Teleportation--theory
PostPosted: Sun Apr 18, 2010 1:30 pm 
Offline
Cellarius
Cellarius
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 12:58 am
Posts: 425
Location: University of Houston, Houston, Texas
Amhlaibh wrote:
What Id like to learn and pass on is effects of orgone vs magnetism?

Magnetism has orgone/prana in it, but orgone has no physical magnetic field -- it is only cosmic. Turning magnets will also create a corresponding current of orgone.

Amhlaibh wrote:
Also lets say it is an orgone generator running into the enclosed pyramid machine, is there any chance orgone has such an effect on the molecules on the immediate enviroment around the machine that it would have the same effect as the machine running in vaccuum?

Orgone can affect space, and in this case it may well be to "freeze" the molecules. Vacuum is the absence of physical substance, which is equivalent to PRESENCE of cosmic substance, as there is no such thing as absolute "nothing" as far as I can say. So an orgone generator would be the logical replacement of a vacuum chamber.

Thanks for that insight, it might help me too in my work...

_________________
It is time.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Antigravity, Invisibility, and Teleportation--theory
PostPosted: Sat Apr 24, 2010 1:30 am 
Offline
Centurio
Centurio

Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 10:53 am
Posts: 125
Location: New Zealand
Thanks Gopi!

So this would mean orgone itself is also made of a positive and negative polarity of a cosmic field sense?
So is orgone basically pulled out of thin air? Rather to say drawn into our 3d realm by something with polarity, such as magnets or the only way I know to create it with positve and negative electricity such as through a joe cell.
I was reading a bit of Ra material that said the pyramid shape naturally drawed in light energy/prana.orgone.
A bit of a problem Im having is understanding the control of it. From what I understand is that it cant be contained, but to some degree it can be directed where you want, eg.. through the exit point at the top of a joe cell.
In the dream the pyramid is contained in a glass or perspex box, so somehow it will need to contain the orgone.
Do you know of any simple ways to create an orgone generator that works with ease?
I only know of the joe cell method which is not very easy to perfect.

Quote:
Thanks for that insight, it might help me too in my work...


Im very happy to help.
Also my friend wants to build the pyramid with an alloy frame as there are a few worries with strength issues, I wanted a perspex pyramid made of the same material as the enclosure but the bonding methods may not handle the rpm? He reckons the alloy wont affect the magnets but Im not so sure as it is stil a metal?
That is unless the orgone enviroment and the magnets pushing and pulling will actually balance it?


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Antigravity, Invisibility, and Teleportation--theory
PostPosted: Tue May 11, 2010 1:35 pm 
Offline
Legatus Legionis
Legatus Legionis
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2004 10:38 pm
Posts: 1795
Location: Northern Rockies
Amhlaibh wrote:
So this would mean orgone itself is also made of a positive and negative polarity of a cosmic field sense?

Orgone is also known as Od, the Odic Force. Might want to take a read of Reichenbach's letters on Od and Magnetism in the Antiquatis library to get a better idea of how it works, based on his research a century ago.

Recent indications from my RS2 research shows that orgone, Od, prana, Qi or Ch'i is quadrapolar in nature--it has 4 poles, not 2.

If you look at the progression, electric charge (1d) and has one pole, EITHER positive or negative, and is only 1/2 effective (oscillation, effective when it counters the progression of the natural reference system).

Move up to magnetic charge (2d) and it is BOTH north and south and fully effective as rotational vibration.

Move up to orgone (3d) and has 4 poles, fully effective but I don't know the names. We've just been referring to them as North, South, East and West. The N/S poles are in space, the E/W poles are in time. Unlike electric and magnetic fields, orgone/prana/qi is effective in BOTH space and time.

It does give an equation... poles = 2n/2 (1, 2, 4).

gopi wrote:
Vacuum is the absence of physical substance, which is equivalent to PRESENCE of cosmic substance, as there is no such thing as absolute "nothing" as far as I can say.

Nothing (vacuum of space) and Everything (solid of time) are reciprocals. I would not refer to the solid of time as "substance", because to have "something" in time means you have to cut a hole (insert vacuum) in that solid of time, just as you have insert solid (time) to get something in space. Space and Time are inside-outs.

Amhlaibh wrote:
So is orgone basically pulled out of thin air? Rather to say drawn into our 3d realm by something with polarity, such as magnets or the only way I know to create it with positve and negative electricity such as through a joe cell.

It already exists in our 3D realm, sort of like The Force of Star Wars. These devices just accumulate it, like vacuuming up dust out of the carpet. The dust is there... just not all in one place. You are, "localizing" orgone.

Amhlaibh wrote:
I was reading a bit of Ra material that said the pyramid shape naturally drawed in light energy/prana.orgone.

Light energy is not orgone. Technically, since photons do not move against the progression of the natural reference system, they exhibit no dimensionality at all... 0D. 20/2 = 1/2 -- it is a "half" pole.

A lot of the confusion surrounding the concept of "energy" comes from electricity, where we can only SEE and TOUCH electric CHARGE -- a 1D rotational VIBRATION. So energy is interpreted as anything with a charge... any kind of vibration, of which "light" is the biggie, since it has an obvious frequency. Actual "energy" is just the inverse of speed, t/s, and something that can effect space, but isn't as "visible" since it has no vibrational component to make it stand out.

And here's the "secret" to pyramids... it's not the shape, but the ratio of lengths and angles. In space, motion is linear or translational, measured by distance. In time, motion is rotational and measured by angle. When distance and angle are set in a harmonic, sympathetic or discordant ratio, things happen in both space and time.

Amhlaibh wrote:
A bit of a problem Im having is understanding the control of it. From what I understand is that it cant be contained, but to some degree it can be directed where you want, eg.. through the exit point at the top of a joe cell.
In the dream the pyramid is contained in a glass or perspex box, so somehow it will need to contain the orgone.
Do you know of any simple ways to create an orgone generator that works with ease?

Life is the simplest orgone generator. But take warning... if you're going to try to extract work/energy out of it, all you'll do is decompose the orgone into electromagnetism, with a byproduct of DOR -- deadly orgone.

Amhlaibh wrote:
Also my friend wants to build the pyramid with an alloy frame as there are a few worries with strength issues, I wanted a perspex pyramid made of the same material as the enclosure but the bonding methods may not handle the rpm? He reckons the alloy wont affect the magnets but Im not so sure as it is stil a metal?
That is unless the orgone enviroment and the magnets pushing and pulling will actually balance it?

Also remember that at 156,000 pole collisions a minute, your device is going to "scream" pretty loud. Living organisms WILL react, including your own body. There's a good reason that a lot of "free energy" inventors get very sick or go insane after playing around with magnetic devices--sort of "unseen consequences" in the Other Realm.

At those speeds, you'd be better off with ceramics, like they use in jet turbine blades. That kind of magnetic turbulence will disrupt the bonding patterns of anything containing nickel, iron or cobalt and you'll lose the crystal grain boundary orientation fairly fast, causing metal fatigue and breakage. Aluminum is probably too brittle to start with, as it could not take the physical vibration from the bucking magnetic fields for very long.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group