Then, at the end of Chapter 16, I see that Larson finally gives Jung some props, but only in the context of a single sentence, in which Jung himself is quoting an error in Freud's work. So, obviously, Larson was aware of Jung.
This leads me to wondering: However could it be that Larson put such little emphasis on Jung's research? Did he simply miss the boat on this one, or did he not put much stock in what Jung had to say? Being the original thinker that Larson was, the latter would seem highly improbable. Quite honestly, it's somewhat frustrating to read through the book and to see Larson state, time and again, how little progress has been made in this area. I keep thinking how much more Larson would have gained, and how much further along the research would have developed, were he to have done an in-depth study into the work of Jung. This, I believe, would have cleared up a great many things for Larson. Instead, he seems to designate all dreams as mere 'reminders' from the previous day's events, and also fails to truly relate them, in any tangible way, to the workings of the reciprocal system, which in and of itself is quite odd. I keep wanting to interject myself into the pages of the book, transport myself back in time and stand next to him at his writing desk, hand him a stack of Jung's works, and then promptly pop back into the pages and back out again into 2017. But then, of course, I might risk doing this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qKqd27h7KjM

Thoughts?