Are People Still Capable of Independent Thought?

A place to conduct polls of the membership. Since voting on polls is a web-only system, there is no associated email list for this forum.

Are People Still Capable of Independent Thought?

Yes, everyone is
2
13%
Yes, but only a small percentage of people
11
69%
Yes, but they choose ignorance
3
19%
No, I can't think about this question
0
No votes
I choose not to answer on the grounds that it would incriminate me
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 16

User avatar
LoneBear
Legatus Legionis
Legatus Legionis
Posts: 3839
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 12:38 am
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Contact:

Are People Still Capable of Independent Thought?

Post by LoneBear » Sun Nov 12, 2017 10:59 pm

I have noticed that there are very few people that seem to be able to "put 1 and 1 together" these days, particularly in the younger generation. It seems the bulk of the population rely on others to do their thinking for them--and these days, it's the lecturers and popular YouTube posters, particularly in the New Age and Conspiracy markets. Most other people seem to just rely on marketing, advertising and managers to tell them what to think, buy and do.

Am I correct in this supposition? Got any thoughts on it? :D
Keeper of the Troth of Ásgarðr, Moriar prius quam dedecorer.

Ilkka
Praefectus
Praefectus
Posts: 769
Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 3:17 am

Re: Are People Still Capable of Independent Thought?

Post by Ilkka » Mon Nov 13, 2017 6:32 am

LoneBear wrote:
Sun Nov 12, 2017 10:59 pm
Am I correct in this supposition? Got any thoughts on it? :D
I really haven't gone out that much but I do watch alot of Youtube videos, some are informative and others just silly entertainment ones. And when I think that what and how people act in various situations, there is a certainity in this supposition to be quite true. Many people are apparently doing as their "superiors" tell them how to do things and act, there are those youtubers that act as "role models" to young teens and are like the authority they advertise their products a book or some shirts which has their brand in them etc. and of course some people buy them to be/belong in "the gang of (enter name here)". Perhaps it is just that simple, people want/need to feel that they belong in somewhere, or be accepted to some place. Maybe that is the "drive" that has been prominent for this kind of behaviour, but how to manipulate such a drive is still in question, maybe with countless of choices to choose from.

There is also religious factor to be accounted for some groups, they are doing what their belief teaches them to do and how to act. Bunch of guns found in mosque in Germany is a dead give away of those certain groups for preparing for something that their "superiors" tell them to do. In certain countries there has been no independent thought at all because of other options are deliberately being cast aside, you either are functioning slave or a dead one.

My answer was the second one, but also there are/must be those that choose to do it knowingly, because it makes them feel comfort perhaps it is kind of natural drug for people to rely on authorities to make their decisions for them. My little brother seems to be no different since he says that only authority over his is some pretty girl that he would like, that would make him to clean his apartment etc. He does not listen to his family members at all, still he believes in modern science and sometimes asks me about some stuff I learned from the Daniel papers, this and CH forums etc. But he doesn't believe me and I am quite tired of answering him anything since I got nothing that he is willing to hear, not even the basic chemistry stuff. He thinks it is better to make his own assumptions, which is good but not when he relies on modern scince too much. He says that there are NO better alternatives and doesn't want to read stuff from you guys, but listens to me trying to tell him something that I am incabable of doing since I cant really teach him anything my way. I dont know a way to teach him anything, so I gave up.

Got out of hand that one.
Enjoy the Silence

User avatar
DSKlausler
Centurio
Centurio
Posts: 150
Joined: Thu May 01, 2014 12:03 pm
Location: My bubble outside Chicago.

Re: Are People Still Capable of Independent Thought?

Post by DSKlausler » Mon Nov 13, 2017 6:44 am

Witnessed the interaction of my wife and her [PhD candidate] friend recently... holy hell, both so obviously controlled by the [mainstream] media. Fear, fear, and more fear... the firearms bullshit dramas and the brown-skinned horseshit stories appear to be working.
Anything is possible with the proper training.

animus
Centurio
Centurio
Posts: 180
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2015 11:18 am

Re: Are People Still Capable of Independent Thought?

Post by animus » Mon Nov 13, 2017 2:00 pm

LoneBear wrote:
Sun Nov 12, 2017 10:59 pm
I have noticed that there are very few people that seem to be able to "put 1 and 1 together" these days, particularly in the younger generation.
Well, from a spectrum of possible answers that goes from 2 all the way to yellow, finding the correct one is not always that easy. Gotta cut them some slack. Now with magenta in the rainbow and all...
LoneBear wrote:
Sun Nov 12, 2017 10:59 pm
It seems the bulk of the population rely on others to do their thinking for them--and these days, it's the lecturers and popular YouTube posters, particularly in the New Age and Conspiracy markets. Most other people seem to just rely on marketing, advertising and managers to tell them what to think, buy and do.

Am I correct in this supposition? Got any thoughts on it? :D
A lot of people are getting weary of the lies and many have given up on mainstream media altogether. To compensate they turned to the Internet for alternative news. So naturally the market has become bigger in this area. It is currently being flooded with all kinds of Gurus and based on the quality of the videos the demographic seems to be first and foremost teenagers.
I barely found any student who was interested in these topics five years ago and learned very fast to give up talking about this stuff and therefore just kept it to myself. Probably because I was surrounded with economic students. I bet it is different these days. It would be hard to ignore after even the mainstream has started talking about other media's, i.e. their own, fake news.


Ilkka wrote:
Mon Nov 13, 2017 6:32 am
There is also religious factor to be accounted for some groups, they are doing what their belief teaches them to do and how to act.
This one is actually funny to observe. Instead of a real religious preacher they go to Youtube and listen to somebody else's religious preaching.
Ilkka wrote:
Mon Nov 13, 2017 6:32 am
Bunch of guns found in mosque in Germany is a dead give away of those certain groups for preparing for something that their "superiors" tell them to do.
Based on your description alone this reads like a PsyOp. But the ploy you are speaking about may have been true on other occasions. I think NWO people don't want any direct blood on their hands but have no problem in instigating scenarios where people kill one another. Not sure how this works Karma-wise. After all, it is the other one's decision to act and the NWO is only planting the idea in the head.


I voted Yes, but they choose ignorance, as that is what I have experienced so far.
My sister told me a story once when she was in 12th grade. Her teacher gave back the exams and told the class that to her astonishment everybody except one was agreeing with the professor's analysis/opinion, which turned out to be wrong, as she then related. (I don't know what the text was about). My sister was the only one disagreeing. She had remembered our brother once telling her that there is nothing wrong with contradicting the experts, even if they have a Dr. or Prof. title. It seems nobody in the class had the guts to do it as well or maybe they really were all in favor, whatever the matter was.
But there was a second lesson in this story: The teacher gave the class' performance score before handing out the corrected exams. One or two got an A. She was excited to see her A after her teacher saluted her only minutes ago. Then to her disappointment she "only" got a B+ and it sounded she was not happy about the grade. But the thing is: she would have been if her teacher hadn't said anything. Reminds me of the Wikipedia article on apperception I read this morning. There is a quote in there that sums it up perfectly:
A rich child and a poor child walking together come across the same ten dollar bill on the sidewalk. The rich child says it is not very much money and the poor child says it is a lot of money. The difference lies in how they apperceive the same event – the lens of past experience through which they see and value (or devalue) the money. — Christopher Ott

I had a similar experience in one of my English exams when I was in 10th grade. My teacher told me that he usually encourages different thinking. However, having a different opinion on this matter was "just not acceptable". I must have stated something outrageous. :D Don't know what it was, I didn't even know when he handed it over because as I recall I didn't even care to look...

User avatar
Andrew
Cellarius
Cellarius
Posts: 267
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2016 9:53 am

Re: Are People Still Capable of Independent Thought?

Post by Andrew » Thu Nov 16, 2017 5:56 pm

By the end of this post I will have decided what to answer on the poll. I believe free-will is penultimate, but generally people are behind layers of dependent thought. Thought given to them through parents, their upbringing, their religion, whether that is a religion in a God and his commandments or the Governmental "god." Everyone comes from a different stance in a world of authority, but most cling to some sense of authority, and so most are limited in their thinking and responses. I would choose, "yes, but they choose ignorance" but to me that would encapsulate all people. Generally, I think that's true. But objectively, I choose "yes, but only a small population are." On /pol/ for instance, they make threads everyday compiling their research, piecing together bread crumbs, investigating the 800+ sealed indictments in the U.S. that are about to be unsealed, the "draining of the swamp," the pedophilia rings, and so much more in detail just tracing corruption directly, no political correctness, no b.s. It is anarchy manifest, and the information is as good as you'll find on the internet.

You have to be pretty capable of independent thought to be an uncommitted investigator. That website has them in droves, if you can understand their nomenclature and the pressure created by an ever-moving website.
"Classical historians traditionally dismiss tales of magic as unworthy of scholarly attention, but to us any mention of a witch's broomstick or wizard's wand evokes the smell of a scientist's laboratory." The Sphinx and the Megaliths

User avatar
LoneBear
Legatus Legionis
Legatus Legionis
Posts: 3839
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 12:38 am
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Contact:

Ignorance is Bliss

Post by LoneBear » Fri Nov 17, 2017 12:52 pm

Andrew wrote:
Thu Nov 16, 2017 5:56 pm
You have to be pretty capable of independent thought to be an uncommitted investigator. That website has them in droves, if you can understand their nomenclature and the pressure created by an ever-moving website.
I have looked at /pol/ and being familiar with psy-ops, what I see can be classified as "directed response for purposes of distraction." The process is relatively easy to do, you just "leak" information that touches the appropriate emotional and mental triggers to direct a conversation, and the conclusions, to where you want it to go--without having any tangible effect. It appears to those engaged as "independent thought," but is far from it.

I'm just about out of "Beyond Space and Time" and am working on typesetting it for republication, and noticed that "independent thought" is a property of the ethical control unit. And there needs to be a sufficient quantity of control units to engage this behavior (much like a temporal displacement of less than 3 has no effect outside the unit boundary).

I believe that most people now lack sufficient "control units" to initiate independent thought. After all, the "powers that be" don't want people thinking for themselves and have created a commercial environment that does everything it can to suppress such behavior. Without a sufficiency of control units, environmental factors take over and people "dumb down" to the ethical ionization level of society--which is about "zero."

So there may be a physical reason that it is NOT "choosing ignorance," but is just a physical impossibility, given the organizational structure of motion in the psyche.
Keeper of the Troth of Ásgarðr, Moriar prius quam dedecorer.

animus
Centurio
Centurio
Posts: 180
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2015 11:18 am

Re: Ignorance is Bliss

Post by animus » Sat Nov 18, 2017 9:39 am

LoneBear wrote:
Fri Nov 17, 2017 12:52 pm
So there may be a physical reason that it is NOT "choosing ignorance," but is just a physical impossibility, given the organizational structure of motion in the psyche.
It might be a bit of both. Those capable of independent thought can still choose ignorance. And I bet a lot of them do. As for those incapable of it, it is probably only limited to certain fields. They may put 1 and 1 together and come up with stuff on their own in some areas and be completely dependent in other areas.

I am not able to see the organizational structure of motion in the psyche, so I can't comment on that.
But you make it sounds like there is little differentiation between man and automaton. Not sure if an insult to the entire human race can get any bigger than that. :lol: Though I wonder if it even counts as an insult when it is backed up by Science...

What about the "lone wolves" in the animal kingdom. Don't they exhibit independent thought? Do they have more control units than most humans do? I reckon not.


At any rate, those who are entrapped in the dumbed down system and hence are not able to help themselves, much less others, have to rely on those who are. So it would be up to the independent thinkers to bring change to the status quo.

User avatar
LoneBear
Legatus Legionis
Legatus Legionis
Posts: 3839
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 12:38 am
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Contact:

Re: Ignorance is Bliss

Post by LoneBear » Sat Nov 18, 2017 2:20 pm

animus wrote:
Sat Nov 18, 2017 9:39 am
It might be a bit of both. Those capable of independent thought can still choose ignorance.
That is the essence of the "secret society."
animus wrote:
Sat Nov 18, 2017 9:39 am
As for those incapable of it, it is probably only limited to certain fields.
Are you suggesting that ethical control units may also have an organ-like structure to them, with a correlation between the ethical organ and some corresponding corpus/anima structure (like phrenology does between mind and body)?

That would give superior ability in specific fields at the onset of ethics, which would then move to encompass the entire experience--becoming the classic "Renaissance Man" (in my days, "a model of versatility," these days, a polymath). Unless something inhibits further development of the ethical body.
animus wrote:
Sat Nov 18, 2017 9:39 am
But you make it sounds like there is little differentiation between man and automaton. Not sure if an insult to the entire human race can get any bigger than that. :lol: Though I wonder if it even counts as an insult when it is backed up by Science...
Compared to homo ethicus, homo sapiens are just "saps."

Class separation exists in every culture, all throughout history. It is only the New Age that tries to blend that away--a technique common for those at the "bottom of the pile" wanting larger benefits without having to do the actual work. And the time I spent in the New Age certainly proved that to me.

And since the Reciprocal System works in discrete quanta, there would be a hard separation between the muggle and wizard, as so much mythology indicates. Due to the aggregate sizes involved (both in the body and population), there will appear to be a blending between the two, but there will still be that hard line--the point of no return--that separates the sap from the Tomorrow People.
animus wrote:
Sat Nov 18, 2017 9:39 am
What about the "lone wolves" in the animal kingdom. Don't they exhibit independent thought? Do they have more control units than most humans do? I reckon not.
Any species can achieve ethical control units. I've even seen it in a cow, just once. When that cow looked back at me--somebody was home. And sure enough intellect was at work, because that cow watched how I got over a trench line (blocking off my water supply from them) and applied it to his own form. Hour later, found her on the other side of the trench, drinking away--with a dozen other cows stuck in the trench! Of course in Wyoming, that was 1 in 450,000... but nevertheless, there was ONE.


animus wrote:
Sat Nov 18, 2017 9:39 am
At any rate, those who are entrapped in the dumbed down system and hence are not able to help themselves, much less others, have to rely on those who are. So it would be up to the independent thinkers to bring change to the status quo.
That is the nature of the evolution of consciousness. And also why dogs, cats and horses like to hang out with humans.
Keeper of the Troth of Ásgarðr, Moriar prius quam dedecorer.

Ilkka
Praefectus
Praefectus
Posts: 769
Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 3:17 am

Re: Ignorance is Bliss

Post by Ilkka » Sun Nov 19, 2017 4:32 am

LoneBear wrote:
Sat Nov 18, 2017 2:20 pm
That is the nature of the evolution of consciousness. And also why dogs, cats and horses like to hang out with humans.
Maybe thats why some of my neighbors are being a-holes towards me and being too noisy especially lately, woken me up at around 4:40 am when walking their dog apparently (it sounds like it).

Perhaps they seek to evolve unconsciously, but still fight against it and me making my life more difficult at the same time. I am very cranky when yanked out of sleep so suddenly and kept that way for several minutes or more, much like anyone would be. Then there are the simulations that play throughout the mind which keeps me awake sometimes 10 minutes or an hour, depending on the mood etc. But I need to tell housing cooperative about them, again to see if it works. I am beyond saying it to their faces because other residents are being quiet enough for me to even not notice them, exept sometimes when the nextdoor dogs are left alone then I can hear their (maybe just the one out of two dogs) "crying", which is quite annoying.

Maybe that is the reason I dont like dogs because of the noise they make, cats are more to my liking. I know they make alot of noise too, when they need to and so on. But the thing that bothers me is that why people who live in flats, apartments etc. need to have a dog as a pet, when they need to go out to do their thing several times a day. Then there are thousands or more of them dogs barking and shitting all over the cities.

The "original job" of dogs has lost its meaning over the "recent" (50 to 60) years. They are being kept out of their "jobs" when being just a pet in some central city. This is the thing I mean, the other dogs that have a job I am no against that at all, I know people still have dogs for hunting, sniffing and guarding. City dogs still guard their surroundings too but there still is something wrong with the picture.

Even got a bit out of topic but still linked into it, as ignorance is bliss. People who have "city dogs" just as a pet are ignorant to the fact that their dog really belongs out of the city, naturally. The certain little dogs like pomeranian or chihuahua what ever "rats" they are, for them I cant think of original job, perhaps they never had any since they are hybridized so much from original canines.

In one episode of "Rick and Morty" there was this thing about dogs and Rick said that to have a dog is to feel superiority over something which would help the person for obvious lack of feeling superior, maybe thats why my little brother (youngest of the family) wanted a dog which he has about 6 years old wiener dog, she is nice always jumping when sees me, still I wouldn't have one of my own dog. I think they belong outside of the house and not inside, because they are "unclean". You wouldn't have a horse inside your house either now would you.
Enjoy the Silence

User avatar
Lozion
Cellarius
Cellarius
Posts: 389
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2013 4:55 pm
Location: Changes all the time..

Re: Are People Still Capable of Independent Thought?

Post by Lozion » Sun Nov 19, 2017 4:44 pm

The operative word of the question for the poll being « capable », I answered #1. The capability was, is, and will be there. But free will being the Prime rule, one « chooses » to or not to adhere to a particular school of thought. Therein lies a weakness exploited by the « The Powers that be soon no more » to further consensus..
In rapport we thrive, in rivalry we strive.

Ilkka
Praefectus
Praefectus
Posts: 769
Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 3:17 am

Re: Are People Still Capable of Independent Thought?

Post by Ilkka » Tue Nov 21, 2017 2:31 am

Lozion wrote:
Sun Nov 19, 2017 4:44 pm
The capability was, is, and will be there. But free will being the Prime rule, one « chooses » to or not to adhere to a particular school of thought.
Perhaps not anymore when child grows up they might loose their independent thought. Take into account all the synthetic devices all around, when kids grow up with them devices always relying on them and not themselves as "judge, jury and executioner" but always someone or something else.

Prime rule doesn't apply if people are devolved enough to throw away their freedom of independent thought. Maybe on a subconscious level they might be aware of this, but chooses to be ruled by body only and not mind, nor spirit. Choosing needs to be a conscious choice though, but when you are trained into something you may not have the luxury of getting second thoughts, much like the Jaffa in SG-1 they were created as slaves and incubators for the Goa'uld and doesn't really have much other choices, but if you've seen the whole series you'll know how that turned out. If humans of earth wouldn't interferred then the Jaffa would still be slaves to the Goa'uld.

So there is this outer influence to do the right thing and what originally did the wrong thing too. It goes both ways much like in RS.
Enjoy the Silence

User avatar
LoneBear
Legatus Legionis
Legatus Legionis
Posts: 3839
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 12:38 am
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Contact:

Re: Are People Still Capable of Independent Thought?

Post by LoneBear » Tue Nov 21, 2017 2:12 pm

Lozion wrote:
Sun Nov 19, 2017 4:44 pm
The operative word of the question for the poll being « capable »
I've always interpreted "capable" as "having the ability," where it is not just potential.

For example, a turkey is capable of flying because it has wings, but does not.
I am not capable of flight, because no matter how hard I flap my arms, I won't get off the ground.

Keeper of the Troth of Ásgarðr, Moriar prius quam dedecorer.

User avatar
DSKlausler
Centurio
Centurio
Posts: 150
Joined: Thu May 01, 2014 12:03 pm
Location: My bubble outside Chicago.

Re: Are People Still Capable of Independent Thought?

Post by DSKlausler » Wed Nov 22, 2017 6:38 am

LoneBear wrote:
Tue Nov 21, 2017 2:12 pm
For example, a turkey is capable of flying because it has wings, but does not.
Nitpicking, I know...

Wild turkeys can, and do fly - though a bit ungainly. I believe domesticated (farmed for food) turkeys, although they obviously do have wings, cannot fly.
Anything is possible with the proper training.

User avatar
LoneBear
Legatus Legionis
Legatus Legionis
Posts: 3839
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 12:38 am
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Contact:

Re: Are People Still Capable of Independent Thought?

Post by LoneBear » Wed Nov 22, 2017 11:22 am

DSKlausler wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 6:38 am
Wild turkeys can, and do fly - though a bit ungainly. I believe domesticated (farmed for food) turkeys, although they obviously do have wings, cannot fly.
I don't think someone would be throwing wild turkeys out of a helicopter. :D
Keeper of the Troth of Ásgarðr, Moriar prius quam dedecorer.

Kent
Indagator
Indagator
Posts: 36
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2016 9:00 am

Re: Are People Still Capable of Independent Thought?

Post by Kent » Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:35 pm

I do think people are capable of independent thought, but largely do not go through the trouble to exercise it (from the poll choices I chose 'yes, but they choose ignorance'). Looking at society from a larger perspective things seem set up to ensure that people do not develop independent thought though. The usual culprits of agenda-driven media and conditioning the populace to be unquestioning consumers seem to largely drive this. So, the question becomes are people choosing ignorance or conditioned to be ignorant? The difference may be largely semantic, but I do think there is a difference that is worthy of conversation.

User avatar
LoneBear
Legatus Legionis
Legatus Legionis
Posts: 3839
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 12:38 am
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Contact:

Re: Are People Still Capable of Independent Thought?

Post by LoneBear » Wed Nov 22, 2017 4:35 pm

Kent wrote:
Wed Nov 22, 2017 3:35 pm
So, the question becomes are people choosing ignorance or conditioned to be ignorant? The difference may be largely semantic, but I do think there is a difference that is worthy of conversation.
There is a difference... it is a matter of conscious knowledge.

Choosing ignorance means you are conscious of the non-ignorant state and, for some overpowering reason, make the choice of "no brain, no pain."

Conditioned ignorance means you are unaware that there is a non-ignorant state, and accept the ignorant condition as the status quo.

If you never question anything, then your are conditioned to be ignorant and know of no other process.

For those that do question, they will eventually stumble upon information that will show their state of ignorance (like finding the --daniel papers). And if they still choose to remain that way, stuck in the Matrix... well, that's a dead end to that evolutionary tree.
Keeper of the Troth of Ásgarðr, Moriar prius quam dedecorer.

User avatar
Andrew
Cellarius
Cellarius
Posts: 267
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2016 9:53 am

Re: Ignorance is Bliss

Post by Andrew » Tue Nov 28, 2017 11:00 am

LoneBear wrote:
Sat Nov 18, 2017 2:20 pm
Are you suggesting that ethical control units may also have an organ-like structure to them, with a correlation between the ethical organ and some corresponding corpus/anima structure (like phrenology does between mind and body)?
If the RS has taught me anything it is that everything is produced through physical interactions. Invisible forces have a physical existence; a source for their field effects. I can't wrap my head around the semantics of a non-physical unit affecting physical units, only that it must be physical in reference to the sector beyond space and time.

daniel said that as one becomes more ethical, fear is replaced with curiosity. So maybe there is a "curious" ethical organ... but alas, babies are naturally curious even though "coming into incarnation, [babies] are fresh out of the ethical realm, but are unable to use [their ethical control units]" until they at least reach puberty.

Also, I think curiosity can be attributed to the Experimentiveness phreno-organ.
"Classical historians traditionally dismiss tales of magic as unworthy of scholarly attention, but to us any mention of a witch's broomstick or wizard's wand evokes the smell of a scientist's laboratory." The Sphinx and the Megaliths

User avatar
LoneBear
Legatus Legionis
Legatus Legionis
Posts: 3839
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 12:38 am
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Contact:

Re: Ignorance is Bliss

Post by LoneBear » Sat Dec 02, 2017 7:47 pm

Andrew wrote:
Tue Nov 28, 2017 11:00 am
If the RS has taught me anything it is that everything is produced through physical interactions. Invisible forces have a physical existence; a source for their field effects. I can't wrap my head around the semantics of a non-physical unit affecting physical units, only that it must be physical in reference to the sector beyond space and time.
What the RS should have taught you is that everything is produced through motion. Conventional science only considers spatial interactions as physical (material sector). Larson considers both the material and cosmic to be physical. I suppose the next, logical step would be to consider motion, in general, as "physical" because it is through motion all interaction takes place.

There will be a structure to ethical control units, just as there is for everything else. It may not be visible to our senses, but, like The Force, will influence the time and space of things. To observe it, you need to know what an interaction is supposed to do--and when it does not do that, time to look for why.
Keeper of the Troth of Ásgarðr, Moriar prius quam dedecorer.

User avatar
Andrew
Cellarius
Cellarius
Posts: 267
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2016 9:53 am

Re: Ignorance is Bliss

Post by Andrew » Sat Dec 02, 2017 11:55 pm

LoneBear wrote:
Sat Dec 02, 2017 7:47 pm
Andrew wrote:
Tue Nov 28, 2017 11:00 am
If the RS has taught me anything it is that everything is produced through physical interactions. Invisible forces have a physical existence; a source for their field effects. I can't wrap my head around the semantics of a non-physical unit affecting physical units, only that it must be physical in reference to the sector beyond space and time.
What the RS should have taught you is that everything is produced through motion. Conventional science only considers spatial interactions as physical (material sector). Larson considers both the material and cosmic to be physical. I suppose the next, logical step would be to consider motion, in general, as "physical" because it is through motion all interaction takes place.
I agree with your statement, and I will consider that from now on. However, I was thinking about my original statement when I was at work today. When I was a pure muggle, I only saw 3D spatial concepts of ego and material. When I was exposed to The Secret and read the Ra Material, I saw there was the material sector and a metaphysical sector. The metaphysical sector then was elusive, but penetrative. Non-physical in essence. Only by studying RS do I see what I considered the metaphysical as being physical, and so it is more real now. The real metaphysical is really the effect of my ethical control units in myself and circumstances upon time and space = consciousness/free-will.

Which reminds me, I haven't described what has happened over the last couple months of doing what is described in the Magnum Opus papers (part of the next [possibly last?] of the daniel anthropology papers?) as amalgamation exercises. People I have known in my past have reached out to me, from out of nowhere, to apologize for last behavior. Old friends that had reason enough to dislike me. Synchronicities in relationships/coworkers/associations. It's really something physical, which is why I will look at the world more as motion, even though I have been doing these exercises as physically, spatially interacting with temporal energies that work instantaneously over space and time.

I have a view of unity, but not the whole thing.
There will be a structure to ethical control units, just as there is for everything else. It may not be visible to our senses, but, like The Force, will influence the time and space of things. To observe it, you need to know what an interaction is supposed to do--and when it does not do that, time to look for why.
This sounds like what I've been telling myself in my magick exercises. Referring to magick as affecting immediate outside circumstances, as opposed to inner amalgamation exercise.

What an interaction is supposed to do = yang. When it does not do that, take the time to look for why = yin.
"Classical historians traditionally dismiss tales of magic as unworthy of scholarly attention, but to us any mention of a witch's broomstick or wizard's wand evokes the smell of a scientist's laboratory." The Sphinx and the Megaliths

User avatar
LoneBear
Legatus Legionis
Legatus Legionis
Posts: 3839
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 12:38 am
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Contact:

Re: Ignorance is Bliss

Post by LoneBear » Sun Dec 03, 2017 10:39 am

Andrew wrote:
Sat Dec 02, 2017 11:55 pm
When I was exposed to The Secret and read the Ra Material, I saw there was the material sector and a metaphysical sector. The metaphysical sector then was elusive, but penetrative. Non-physical in essence. Only by studying RS do I see what I considered the metaphysical as being physical, and so it is more real now. The real metaphysical is really the effect of my ethical control units in myself and circumstances upon time and space = consciousness/free-will.
Check the origin of the word, metaphysics. It has nothing to do with "beyond the physical..."
Andrew wrote:
Sat Dec 02, 2017 11:55 pm
Which reminds me, I haven't described what has happened over the last couple months of doing what is described in the Magnum Opus papers (part of the next [possibly last?] of the daniel anthropology papers?) as amalgamation exercises.
Danny boy is getting in the mood to write something, but does not know what to write on. Was considering a paper on wizardry, but unsure if people are ready for something like that. As Doctor Who (Pat Troughton) said, "give a monkey control of his environment and he'll fill the world with bananas!" So if you have specific suggestions, let him know over on ConsciousHugs.
Andrew wrote:
Sat Dec 02, 2017 11:55 pm
It's really something physical, which is why I will look at the world more as motion, even though I have been doing these exercises as physically, spatially interacting with temporal energies that work instantaneously over space and time.
You need to understand that there are different kinds of "physical." We normally use just a single perspective, that of the point and line. Start somewhere (point) and move outward, along a straight line. The "other half" is its geometric reciprocal... in 4D space-time (s3t):

0D point <=> 3D volume
1D line <=> 2D plane
2D plane <=> 1D plane

So conventional "physical" gets yanked inside-out--what was the "center point" is now a "central volume" which appears to start at infinity and head in. And when you move, you spread out across a plane, not a line. If you look at the behavior, the geometric dual acts just like aether--starts out everywhere, and you start reducing the dimensions to get things to manifest.

It is the difference between air and water... in the air, you have drops of water. In the water, you have drops of air (bubbles). Just inside-out from each other. The cosmic sector manifests like you are underwater--which is why it is a "field effect" that is spread out across a volume, around an atom.
Andrew wrote:
Sat Dec 02, 2017 11:55 pm
This sounds like what I've been telling myself in my magick exercises. Referring to magick as affecting immediate outside circumstances, as opposed to inner amalgamation exercise.
Just remember that magick is cosmic and inside-out. In the material, the strongest effect is closest to the center. But when the center is a volume... the strongest effect is seen at its periphery, and the weakest nearest the center. So you have to "know your limits," as that limit is where magick is the strongest.

See Larson's paper, The Density Gradient in White Dwarf Stars for a scientific explanation.
Andrew wrote:
Sat Dec 02, 2017 11:55 pm
What an interaction is supposed to do = yang. When it does not do that, take the time to look for why = yin.
Generalize that to psychology: compare your life to the "social norm" (what you are supposed to do), then see where you deviate from that norm. That will teach you a lot about yourself.
Keeper of the Troth of Ásgarðr, Moriar prius quam dedecorer.

User avatar
LoneBear
Legatus Legionis
Legatus Legionis
Posts: 3839
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 12:38 am
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Contact:

Re: Are People Still Capable of Independent Thought?

Post by LoneBear » Mon Dec 04, 2017 11:48 am

I was looking at the site statistics today and noticed that this site gets approximately 3600 unique visitors each month--yet only 14 people responded to this simple poll. And of those, less than half posted any kind of comment. My posts comprise some 26.3% of all the posts on the forum, with close to 300 registered users.

I would like to know what I am doing wrong? Why are others not "sharing their maps" (research, knowledge, experience)? Is it a matter of choosing NOT to exercise independent though, even though the capacity is there?

The original incarnation of this forum, back in the last 1980s prior to "Internet," was called "New Order"--prior to Bush's declaration of the New World Order. After that, it was called Breiðablik, the only place to survive Ragnarok in Norse mythology, but that was a little hard for people to remember/spell. It has been Antiquatis for about 15 years now.

The "New Order" days were the days of the scientific underground, where people actually contributed their research and ideas, to help advance understanding and increase consciousness. Even though there were only a couple dozen people, I'd log in and there would be 50 unread posts a day. We all learned so much, so fast, because of that exchange.

The Breiðablik days saw a decrease in that, as age started to take its toll on the scientific underground folks. The early versions of Antiquatis were quite active, as you can see from the older posts. But it seems that with each passing year, fewer and fewer people will say anything... I simply cannot understand why people withhold knowledge that can be beneficial to others. Has the world become that selfish?

Someone, please explain it to me.
Keeper of the Troth of Ásgarðr, Moriar prius quam dedecorer.

User avatar
Andrew
Cellarius
Cellarius
Posts: 267
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2016 9:53 am

Re: Are People Still Capable of Independent Thought?

Post by Andrew » Mon Dec 04, 2017 1:01 pm

LoneBear wrote:
Mon Dec 04, 2017 11:48 am
Someone, please explain it to me.
I think it has to do with the lethargy caused by the increase of daily EMF exposure, and with that, maybe because our social networks are more digital, people fear more now about being wrong. It's a harsh reality that people's opinions on the internet are nearly permanently recorded, can be used against you. Hell, Facebook is now employing technology that will contact your local police if you are using language that triggers their "suicide prevention" software. Coupled with the fact that the written word transfers only a percentage of what one is trying to communicate, police authorities or authorities on any subject matter (assumed "experts"), by nature of the limitation of communication, feel validated sharing only what they know to be correct.

This is why Anonymous boards like 4chan has become an internet refuge for free speech. Nothing can be traced back to you, so you can say whatever you want, at a cost to storage, decorum, and civility. (99% a yang board.)

I was actually midway making a post earlier this year, but couldn't find reason enough to articulate what I was feeling... till now. I'll post it and copy my present elaboration on the subject.

My thoughts on the appeal a magical school has to attracting others is that it shouldn't take itself so seriously. Antiquatis resonates with me as more of a Yellow vMeme, yang-oriented name, even though it is scientifically appropriate. I like the name. I just feel it can be intimidating to jump into, because there is so much material! You're afraid you're not of adequate understanding to contribute without being wrong or misunderstanding the intentions of the school. Whereas a name with a yin-origin (taken and inspired from a dream/the cosmic sector) it bypasses the ego a little bit, enough to be curious about, hey what's going on here? Seems a little silly, but dreams often are. That's what I think should change.
"Classical historians traditionally dismiss tales of magic as unworthy of scholarly attention, but to us any mention of a witch's broomstick or wizard's wand evokes the smell of a scientist's laboratory." The Sphinx and the Megaliths

User avatar
LoneBear
Legatus Legionis
Legatus Legionis
Posts: 3839
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 12:38 am
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Contact:

Re: Are People Still Capable of Independent Thought?

Post by LoneBear » Mon Dec 04, 2017 5:52 pm

Andrew wrote:
Mon Dec 04, 2017 1:01 pm
I think it has to do with the lethargy caused by the increase of daily EMF exposure, and with that, maybe because our social networks are more digital, people fear more now about being wrong.
Given that "everything you know is wrong" to begin with, I guess the real fear of posting something would be "being RIGHT."
Andrew wrote:
Mon Dec 04, 2017 1:01 pm
by nature of the limitation of communication, feel validated sharing only what they know to be correct.
I think you mean "politically correct."
Andrew wrote:
Mon Dec 04, 2017 1:01 pm
This is why Anonymous boards like 4chan has become an internet refuge for free speech. Nothing can be traced back to you, so you can say whatever you want, at a cost to storage, decorum, and civility. (99% a yang board.)
In the 30 years I've been posting, I have never found any value to anonymous boards. It is not something I would ever implement here (you cannot post anonymously) because I uphold the 5th density idea of Honor. This concept does not exist in things like 4chan, where it is all "alpha males" trying to piss on each other to mark their territory.

Many, many years ago, back in my young "biker" days, I bought some spiked wrist bands from a company in California, because I liked their motto: Show your colors with pride. In other words, you should never be afraid to be who you actually are. I think that is what has been taken from your generation.

And if you think "anonymous" cannot be traced back to you... you must be REALLY naïve. EVERY internet packet contains a timestamp, source and destination addresses--and are LOGGED via every system they pass through. If you are on Windows, open up a command prompt and type "tracert antiquatis.org" (on (*nix systems, "traceroute antiquatis.org"). "tracert" is "trace the route," a tool used in debugging network problems and you will see the list of who is transferring your packets. With that info, they can contact your ISP who has the exact times your IP address has been leased to you, so they know who you are and even on what computer you are posting from inside your house.

If you want a truly anonmyous system, then the connection from/to your computer and the server would have to be over VPN (virtual private network--which Antiquatis does support, BTW), then the actual post would have to be put on a random delay, from microseconds to days, to alter the posting timestamp so a correlation cannot be drawn between the post time and connected user times. And that is just the tip of the iceberg.
Andrew wrote:
Mon Dec 04, 2017 1:01 pm
I was actually midway making a post earlier this year, but couldn't find reason enough to articulate what I was feeling... till now. I'll post it and copy my present elaboration on the subject.
People do not need to post peer-reviewed dissertations; I certainly don't. I post interesting things I run across when doing research--things that caught my imagination or attention, in hopes that others might benefit from the correlation. They are just opinions; nothing that is right or wrong--just new perspectives to consider. That is what "sharing your map" is all about--SHARING your map of the interesting places you've visited or heard about.
Andrew wrote:
Mon Dec 04, 2017 1:01 pm
My thoughts on the appeal a magical school has to attracting others is that it shouldn't take itself so seriously. Antiquatis resonates with me as more of a Yellow vMeme, yang-oriented name, even though it is scientifically appropriate. I like the name. I just feel it can be intimidating to jump into, because there is so much material! You're afraid you're not of adequate understanding to contribute without being wrong or misunderstanding the intentions of the school. Whereas a name with a yin-origin (taken and inspired from a dream/the cosmic sector) it bypasses the ego a little bit, enough to be curious about, hey what's going on here? Seems a little silly, but dreams often are. That's what I think should change.
I chose Antiquatis for a couple of reasons...

Code: Select all

antiqu.atis          V      1 1 PRES ACTIVE  IND 2 P
antiquat.is          VPAR   1 1 DAT P X PERF PASSIVE PPL
antiquat.is          VPAR   1 1 ABL P X PERF PASSIVE PPL
antiquo, antiquare, antiquavi, antiquatus  V (1st) TRANS   [XXXCO]
antiquatus, antiquata -um, antiquatior -or -us, antiquatissimus -a -um  ADJ   [FXXEE] 
Medieval  uncommon
old/ancient/aged; time-honored; simple/classic; venerable; archaic/outdated;
The first was that I had recently watched the Stargate SG-1 episode, "The 5th Race," where O'Neill gets ancient knowledge and translates the inscription "nos sunt antiquatis" (we are the ancient ones). As one of the Elder Race, I thought it would be appropriate.

It also made for a unique word for search engines, and based on the medieval translation, refers to the ancient, old, time-honored knowledge--mythology, legend and the stuff dreams are made of.

However, your reasons do not seem very valid to me, since everything you know is wrong, anyway, and "anonymous" posting is never anonymous. To quote Delenn when Londo was asking if Vir could be the Centauri ambassador to Minbar... "And now, the truth?"
Keeper of the Troth of Ásgarðr, Moriar prius quam dedecorer.

zuoqian
Indagator
Indagator
Posts: 49
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 7:35 pm

Re: Are People Still Capable of Independent Thought?

Post by zuoqian » Mon Dec 04, 2017 8:44 pm

LoneBear wrote:
Mon Dec 04, 2017 11:48 am
Someone, please explain it to me.
My ideas are:

1.Education system's change. After the information explosion, the younger generation study a lot more new information but less deep understanding of the classic knowledge to gain a thorough understanding of the topic of the discussion.

2. Life style change. More pressure of life, more trivial things in living, less free time also a lot of which occupied by smartphone apps. So there are not enough time and enthusiasm for deep thinking to form original thoughts and do independent research.

3. Weak ability of expression. Many people just can not easily convert thoughts to words, especially using non-native language.

User avatar
DSKlausler
Centurio
Centurio
Posts: 150
Joined: Thu May 01, 2014 12:03 pm
Location: My bubble outside Chicago.

Re: Are People Still Capable of Independent Thought?

Post by DSKlausler » Tue Dec 05, 2017 8:13 am

zuoqian wrote:
Mon Dec 04, 2017 8:44 pm
LoneBear wrote:
Mon Dec 04, 2017 11:48 am
Someone, please explain it to me.
My ideas are:

1.Education system's change. After the information explosion, the younger generation study a lot more new information but less deep understanding of the classic knowledge to gain a thorough understanding of the topic of the discussion.

2. Life style change. More pressure of life, more trivial things in living, less free time also a lot of which occupied by smartphone apps. So there are not enough time and enthusiasm for deep thinking to form original thoughts and do independent research.

3. Weak ability of expression. Many people just can not easily convert thoughts to words, especially using non-native language.
Just so.

Personally, I have little to offer others. My expertise lies in fitness and wilderness. My profession is high-level programming (non-web). So, my comments are few and far between. Maybe it's due to my science background, or age, but I do read and comprehend every post - and am very thankful that I found this place.
Anything is possible with the proper training.

Post Reply